From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Subject: Re: Use of entries using Ravenscar
Date: 22 Dec 2001 12:25:30 +0000
Date: 2001-12-22T12:25:32+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <x7vlmfv7879.fsf@smaug.pushface.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: usna67xaf.fsf@gsfc.nasa.gov
Stephen Leake <stephen.a.leake.1@gsfc.nasa.gov> writes:
> In any case, this is complaining about the internals of the GNAT
> runtime system; note the package name "System.Tasking". It could be
> you have some object and/or .ali files hanging around from either
> "the old compiler" or "compiling without Pragma (Ravenscar)". Try
> deleting _everything_, and recompiling from scratch.
The example gives the same error messages under 3.14a1.
Ravenscar is (implemented as) a set of restrictions, and it turns out
that the problem shows up only if you have all three of
pragma Restrictions (No_Abort_Statements);
pragma Restrictions (No_Entry_Queue);
pragma Restrictions (Max_Asynchronous_Select_Nesting => 0);
The listing produced with -gnatDG is
with ada;
with ada;
with ada.ada__real_time;
with ada.ada__text_io;
with signal_handler_test;
use ada.ada__real_time, ada.ada__text_io, signal_handler_test;
with ada.ada__real_time.ada__real_time__delays;
with system;
with system.system__tasking;
with system.system__tasking.system__tasking__protected_objects.
system__tasking__protected_objects__single_entry;
procedure test_entry is
period : constant duration := 500000000.0E-8;
next_time : ada__real_time__time;
L_1 : label
begin
L_1 : loop
next_time := ada__real_time__Oadd (ada__real_time__clock,
ada__real_time__to_time_span (period));
ada__real_time__delays__delay_until (next_time);
B1b : declare
begin
system__tasking__protected_objects__single_entry__protected_single_entry_call
(signal_handler_test__protected_signal_handler_testTV!(
signal_handler_test__protected_signal_handler_test)._object'
unchecked_access, system__null_address,
system__tasking__simple_call);
end B1b;
end loop L_1;
end test_entry;
which is a lot simpler than what's generated without Ravenscar.
This really does look like a candidate for support from those who know
what they're talking about!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-22 12:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-12-18 16:28 Use of entries using Ravenscar Jimmy Dubén
2001-12-20 7:54 ` Jimmy Dubén
2001-12-20 8:46 ` martin.m.dowie
2001-12-20 13:52 ` Jimmy Dubén
2001-12-20 14:59 ` Stephen Leake
2001-12-20 15:14 ` martin.m.dowie
2001-12-20 20:34 ` Jimmy Dub�n
2001-12-21 22:47 ` martin.m.dowie
2001-12-22 1:52 ` Jimmy Dub�n
2001-12-22 15:27 ` martin.m.dowie
2001-12-22 22:56 ` Jimmy Dub�n
2001-12-23 11:02 ` martin.m.dowie
2001-12-22 12:25 ` Simon Wright [this message]
2001-12-23 18:48 ` Jimmy Dub�n
2001-12-26 18:02 ` Simon Wright
2001-12-23 20:01 ` Stephen Leake
2001-12-24 8:52 ` Jimmy Dub�n
2001-12-26 18:20 ` Simon Wright
2001-12-27 10:57 ` Jimmy Dub�n
2001-12-28 18:36 ` Simon Wright
2001-12-27 11:11 ` Florian Weimer
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox