From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Subject: Re: [Newbie] Amalgamate child units
Date: 12 Jun 2004 13:23:57 +0100
Date: 2004-06-12T13:23:57+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <x7vekolj76q.fsf@smaug.pushface.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 40cacf5b$0$12749$636a15ce@news.free.fr
"PG" <leviquet@free.fr> writes:
> Hi,
>
> When I want import some child units, like:
> with A, A.B, A.B.B1, A.B.B2, A.C, A.C.C1...
>
> is it possible to write: with A.* or something else ?
No, but
with A.B.B1;
implies A and A.B, so your sample as far as it goes could be written
with A.B.B1;
with A.B.B2;
with A.C.C1;
However I'm not at all sure that it adds to the clarity to do
this. It's not obvious, really, that you are in fact interested in A.B
...
--
Simon Wright 100% Ada, no bugs.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-12 12:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-12 9:40 [Newbie] Amalgamate child units PG
2004-06-12 9:51 ` Marius Amado Alves
2004-06-12 12:13 ` Martin Krischik
2004-06-12 13:46 ` Vinzent 'Gadget' Hoefler
2004-06-14 6:09 ` Martin Krischik
2004-06-14 19:02 ` Mark Lorenzen
2004-06-15 6:57 ` Vinzent 'Gadget' Hoefler
2004-06-12 12:23 ` Simon Wright [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox