From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Subject: Re: Instantiating a generic ADT from another ADT
Date: 27 Apr 2001 20:22:01 +0100
Date: 2001-04-27T19:22:01+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <x7vd79yrvvq.fsf@smaug.pushface.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 9c26rp$42v$1@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk
"Des Walker" <des.walker@dessy.fsnet.co.uk> writes:
> If you're looking for code to handle generic lists have you tried using
> the Booch Components.
The next release of the BCs will say
<dt>Lists; to use or not to use?</dt>
<dd>
Many people, faced with the BCs for the first time, choose Lists
(Single or Double) as their standard Container.
<p>This is probably <em>not</em> the best choice. Lists are complex
entities which, I suppose, would be useful if you were implementing a
list-processing engine like Lisp.
<p><font color="red">You'll be a lot better off using
Collections!</font>
<p>
</dd>
(pardon the HTML :)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-04-27 19:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-23 0:14 Instantiating a generic ADT from another ADT Alex Angas
2001-04-23 2:46 ` Jeffrey Carter
2001-04-23 3:03 ` Alex Angas
2001-04-23 22:29 ` Des Walker
2001-04-23 23:48 ` Marc A. Criley
2001-04-24 5:26 ` Alex Angas
2001-04-24 6:31 ` Des Walker
2001-04-27 19:22 ` Simon Wright [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox