From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Subject: Re: Question: Combination of Access and Constraining
Date: 23 Feb 2003 12:34:03 +0000
Date: 2003-02-23T12:34:03+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <x7vd6lji3b8.fsf@smaug.pushface.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3E56AE14.9B5F31A@tsoft.com
Yuri <yuri@tsoft.com> writes:
> I agree mostly, but there could be projects where performance is
> critical.
>
> If rate of processing is low than performance is no issue. But if
> say you process real-time video higher-performance processor may
> make project cost-inefficient.
Many programmes have some time-critical areas. But it's not common (in
my experience) for something like parameter passing style to have much
impact, unless it's completely bizarre (passing 1MB arreays by copy
would count as bizarre!) More often it's very localized, and better
algorithms will make much more difference.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-23 12:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-20 8:06 Question: Combination of Access and Constraining Papandopulo
2003-02-20 9:00 ` tmoran
2003-02-20 9:29 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2003-02-20 15:20 ` Papandopulo
2003-02-20 16:20 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2003-02-20 17:58 ` Jeffrey Carter
2003-02-20 20:35 ` Yuri
2003-02-21 1:21 ` Jeffrey Carter
2003-02-21 22:53 ` Yuri
2003-02-23 12:34 ` Simon Wright [this message]
2003-02-23 17:50 ` Jeffrey Carter
2003-02-23 17:55 ` John R. Strohm
2003-02-23 17:48 ` John R. Strohm
2003-02-20 13:12 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
2003-02-20 15:00 ` Matthew Heaney
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-02-20 9:46 Grein, Christoph
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox