From: Simon Wright <simon@pogner.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Which compiler is correct?
Date: 1997/06/21
Date: 1997-06-21T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <x7v9103wu0p.fsf@pogner.demon.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: EC3tGJ.F0A@world.std.com
bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff) writes:
[my ramblings deleted]
> This can be confusing, but at least the confusion happens at compile
> time, not at run time. :-)
Yes, of course, I hadn't considered the alternative!
--
Simon Wright Work Email: simon.j.wright@gecm.com
GEC-Marconi Radar & Defence Systems Voice: +44(0)1705-701778
Command & Information Systems Divsion FAX: +44(0)1705-701800
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1997-06-21 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-06-17 0:00 Which compiler is correct? Tom Moran
1997-06-18 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1997-06-18 0:00 ` John Woodruff
1997-06-19 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1997-06-20 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1997-06-21 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1997-06-26 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1997-06-19 0:00 ` Simon Wright
1997-06-20 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1997-06-21 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1997-06-21 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1997-06-21 0:00 ` Simon Wright [this message]
1997-06-23 0:00 ` Mats.Weber
1997-06-24 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1997-06-18 0:00 ` Pascal Obry
1997-06-18 0:00 ` Tom Moran
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1996-09-10 0:00 Which compiler is correct?? Robert B. Love
1996-09-10 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-09-10 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-09-11 0:00 ` Robert B. Love
1996-09-11 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1996-09-11 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1996-09-12 0:00 ` Ken Cowan
1996-09-12 0:00 ` Ken Cowan
1996-09-13 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1996-09-12 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox