From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Subject: Re: Problem space (Re: Using Ada for device drivers? (Was: the Ada mandate...))
Date: 13 May 2003 22:07:02 +0100
Date: 2003-05-13T22:07:02+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <x7v8ytav9mx.fsf@smaug.pushface.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: b9oq3a$7i$1@msunews.cl.msu.edu
"Chad R. Meiners" <crmeiners@hotmail.com> writes:
> "Stephen Leake" <Stephe.Leake@nasa.gov> wrote in message
> news:u3cjk81gg.fsf@nasa.gov...
> > But push it to the extreme, and people will say we should be
> > programming in UML, not Ada.
>
> But that is a foolish argument since UML is not well defined.
There is nothing to prevent definition of a subset ('profile') that is
rigorously-enough defined to be translated. You can do that with a
small core of UML. For example, http://www.projtech.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-13 21:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-12 1:31 Problem space (Re: Using Ada for device drivers? (Was: the Ada mandate...)) Alexandre E. Kopilovitch
2003-05-12 10:08 ` Mário Amado Alves
2003-05-13 21:04 ` Simon Wright
2003-05-12 18:27 ` Stephen Leake
2003-05-12 18:40 ` Chad R. Meiners
2003-05-13 13:27 ` Stephen Leake
2003-05-13 21:07 ` Simon Wright [this message]
2003-05-14 0:23 ` Chad R. Meiners
2003-05-13 20:35 ` Problem space (Re: Using Ada for device drivers? (Was: the Adamandate...)) Craig Carey
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox