From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Subject: Re: copy constructor for sockets
Date: 24 May 2004 05:53:55 +0100
Date: 2004-05-24T05:53:55+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <x7v8yfi77do.fsf@smaug.pushface.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: usmdq1jm4.fsf@earthlink.net
Matthew Heaney <matthewjheaney@earthlink.net> writes:
> > in which of these times you should decrement,
>
> Huh? Every time, of course. How could it be otherwise? What would
> a reference counting scheme even mean, if you didn't decrement the
> refcount during finalization of the object?
I have it stuck in my head that Finalize can get called more than
once. Which would make a mockery of (simple-minded) reference counting
schemes, of course. Please tell me it ain't so! (or explain why it's
not actually a problem ..)
--
Simon Wright 100% Ada, no bugs.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-24 4:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-22 10:19 copy constructor for sockets Andrew Carroll
2004-05-22 11:55 ` Simon Wright
2004-05-22 18:39 ` tmoran
2004-05-23 21:04 ` Matthew Heaney
2004-05-24 7:13 ` Marius Amado Alves
2004-05-24 3:23 ` Matthew Heaney
2004-05-24 4:53 ` Simon Wright [this message]
2004-05-24 5:20 ` tmoran
2004-05-25 4:53 ` Simon Wright
2004-05-24 12:36 ` Matthew Heaney
2004-05-25 21:50 ` Robert I. Eachus
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-05-22 21:18 Andrew Carroll
2004-05-22 21:46 ` tmoran
2004-05-23 11:21 ` Simon Wright
2004-05-24 18:26 ` tmoran
2004-05-25 5:10 ` Simon Wright
2004-05-25 6:37 ` tmoran
2004-05-23 9:43 ` Mark Lorenzen
2004-05-23 11:27 ` Simon Wright
2004-05-24 11:28 Andrew Carroll
2004-05-25 5:29 ` Simon Wright
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox