Re: Use of entries using Ravenscar

[Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 613 bytes --]

"Jimmy Dub�n" <duben@fatburen.org> writes:

> OK, but signal 10 is reserved if you use rts-native instead of
> rts-fsu, we have used the latter one since we think it has better
> handling for threads.  One has to change the soft link between the
> two libraries to use rts-fsu.

The most common reason I have for using tasks is to handle
asynchronous (usually socket) I/O, and it's really useful to be able
to have one task block on a read() while the rest of the program
carries on. So FSU threads are not practical (for us).

I have no idea whether GNAT supports FSU threads *and* Ravenscar --
anyone else?