From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Subject: Re: chained List manipulation without recusrsion : lost the begining of my List!
Date: 17 May 2003 08:03:26 +0100
Date: 2003-05-17T08:03:26+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <x7v7k8qdphd.fsf@smaug.pushface.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: wccptmj4rwz.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com
Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com> writes:
> Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org> writes:
>
> > "Zeg" <zeg.nospam@9online.fr> writes:
>
> > > Z : Liste := null;
> >
> > You don't need to initialize access variables, they are automatically
> > set to null for you
>
> True, but I think a good style is to always use explicit initialization
> if you are going to depend on the initial "null" (as opposed to just
> using it to trip up uninitialized pointers).
I suppose we just have to disagree here! (but only a little). To me it
feels to be rather like
if Boolean_Variable = True then
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-17 7:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-14 23:20 chained List manipulation without recusrsion : lost the begining of my List! Zeg
2003-05-15 5:58 ` Simon Wright
2003-05-15 12:25 ` Zeg
2003-05-15 13:16 ` Zeg
2003-05-15 19:02 ` Jeffrey Carter
2003-05-16 1:11 ` Robert A Duff
2003-05-17 7:03 ` Simon Wright [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox