From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Subject: Re: Pitfall: freeing access discriminants
Date: 13 Feb 2003 21:17:03 +0000
Date: 2003-02-13T21:17:03+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <x7v4r77ubhs.fsf@smaug.pushface.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: kxT2a.99958$be.71860@rwcrnsc53
tmoran@acm.org writes:
> I seems to me that you needn't worry that
> > Because of storage pools for Integer_Ptr may be different
> > from storage pool used by "new".
> because you get a standard storage pool unless you specify otherwise, so
> > type T(D: access Integer)
> > type Integer_Ptr is access all Integer;
> should both refer to the same storage pool.
I don't see how you can be sure that D.all is allocated from the same
pool as 'access all Integer'? (a bit odd anyway, if you say 'access
*all* ' you imply that blind deallocation is iffy).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-13 21:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-13 12:41 Pitfall: freeing access discriminants Grein, Christoph
2003-02-13 13:38 ` Victor Porton
2003-02-13 20:49 ` tmoran
2003-02-13 21:17 ` Simon Wright [this message]
2003-02-14 4:16 ` tmoran
2003-02-14 21:30 ` Simon Wright
2003-02-14 8:28 ` Victor Porton
2003-02-22 19:00 ` Robert A Duff
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-02-14 6:21 Grein, Christoph
2003-02-14 6:02 Grein, Christoph
2003-02-13 10:04 Victor Porton
2003-02-13 12:07 ` Victor Porton
2003-02-13 13:42 ` Preben Randhol
2003-02-13 17:40 ` Stephen Leake
2003-02-13 19:24 ` Victor Porton
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox