From: Andre Spiegel <spiegel@inf.fu-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: What's Pure for Dist Sytems?
Date: 1997/06/19
Date: 1997-06-19T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <x2pvtianx1.fsf@inf.fu-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 5oa5ol$8vv$1@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au
Dale Stanbrough <dale@goanna.cs.rmit.EDU.AU> writes:
> After playing with Gnatdist and wanting to use it as a basis for some
> assignment work, I was struck by the extent of the restriction of only
> Pragma Pure for "Remote Call Interface" packages.
> I was especially upset at the restriction of no {un}bounded strings.
> Is there anything that i'm missing here?
There is a proposal to add pragma Remote_Types to some of the
predefined packages (see Ada Issue ai-00126, at
http://sw-eng.falls-church.va.us/AdaIC/standards/95com/ada-issues/).
However, even under this proposal, Ada.Strings.Bounded and
Ada.Strings.Unbounded are still non-remote. I find this an
intolerable restriction, too, and I wonder if anyone sets out to
remedy this...
Andre Spiegel
Free University of Berlin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1997-06-19 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-06-19 0:00 What's Pure for Dist Sytems? Dale Stanbrough
1997-06-19 0:00 ` Andre Spiegel [this message]
1997-06-19 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1997-06-20 0:00 ` Andre Spiegel
1997-06-20 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1997-06-20 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-06-24 0:00 ` Andre Spiegel
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox