From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@world.std.com>
Subject: Re: Visibility Rules For Children
Date: 1998/10/27
Date: 1998-10-27T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <wccyaq2byus.fsf@world.std.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: m34sss6juk.fsf@mheaney.ni.net
Matthew Heaney <matthew_heaney@acm.org> writes:
> What are the visibility rules for children?
They're pretty subtle. Read 3.4, 7.3.1, and 12.something.
Your example looks legal to me. There is a place immediately within the
immediate scope of the derived type, where I is visible; therefore, the
inherited I should also become visible.
- Bob
--
Change robert to bob to get my real email address. Sorry.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1998-10-27 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1998-10-26 0:00 Visibility Rules For Children Matthew Heaney
1998-10-26 0:00 ` Martin Dowie
1998-10-27 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1998-10-27 0:00 ` Martin Dowie
1998-10-27 0:00 ` Robert A Duff [this message]
1998-10-28 0:00 ` Stephen Leake
1998-10-29 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1998-11-02 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox