comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Subject: Re: Memory management clarification
Date: 26 Jul 2005 10:21:18 -0400
Date: 2005-07-26T10:21:18-04:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <wccu0ihzm01.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: VirFe.4693$3p2.511@trndny04

"Frank J. Lhota" <NOSPAM.lhota@adarose.com> writes:

> Maciej Sobczak wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Trying to learn a bit of Ada I came across a statement that memory
> > allocated from the pool will be implicitly reclaimed when the acces
> > variable used to reference it goes out of scope.
> 
> No, that is not true. What is true is that if an access type goes out of
> scope, then the data allocated from the pool for that type will be
> reclaimed. See ARM 13.11 (18).

That's not quite true, either.  Most implementations use a global heap
by default, and never automatically reclaim memory.  If you use a
Storage_Size clause on a local access type, then what you say is true.
But local access types are not very useful.

> Most Ada implementations do not support garbage collection, and with
> such implementations, your examples would simply create a lot of garbage.

Right.

- Bob



  reply	other threads:[~2005-07-26 14:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-07-26  9:57 Memory management clarification Maciej Sobczak
2005-07-26 10:38 ` Adrien Plisson
2005-07-26 14:19   ` Robert A Duff
2005-07-26 13:57 ` Frank J. Lhota
2005-07-26 14:21   ` Robert A Duff [this message]
2005-07-26 18:11     ` Frank J. Lhota
2005-07-26 14:17 ` Robert A Duff
2005-07-26 15:39   ` Maciej Sobczak
2005-07-26 17:45     ` Robert A Duff
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox