From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Subject: Re: Ada_Programming/Types/delta
Date: 11 May 2006 18:50:40 -0400
Date: 2006-05-11T18:50:40-04:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <wccu07wmb0f.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1147376013.928071.10700@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com
"REH" <spamjunk@stny.rr.com> writes:
> Somone should also fix the nomenclature. The article defines the two
> types of fixed point types as "binary" and "decimal." I was informed
> in this group that saying "binary" is incorrect and should be "normal."
Yes, you're right. But I think the RM terminology is "ordinary"
vs. "decimal".
I think the confusion is due to the fact that for "ordinary" ones, the
Small _defaults_ to binary. But you can override it with a Small clause
that's decimal, or whatever else you like.
If I ran the circus, Small would equal Delta, so there would be no need
for Small as a separate concept. Having the compiler choose a Small
different from the Delta just leads to confusion, IMHO.
- Bob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-11 22:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-11 18:23 Ada_Programming/Types/delta Martin Krischik
2006-05-11 19:33 ` Ada_Programming/Types/delta REH
2006-05-11 22:42 ` Ada_Programming/Types/delta Randy Brukardt
2006-05-12 0:03 ` Ada_Programming/Types/delta REH
2006-05-11 22:50 ` Robert A Duff [this message]
2006-05-11 22:45 ` Ada_Programming/Types/delta Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox