From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Subject: Re: default formal parameters in generic declarations
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2008 12:42:38 -0500
Date: 2008-03-02T12:42:38-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <wccskz93tv5.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 9b3bac4d-5ae1-4a1b-a81e-9aa9ae1843e0@e31g2000hse.googlegroups.com
Eric Hughes <eric.eh9@gmail.com> writes:
> I've spent some time reading ARM2005/12. Generic Units. Formal
> objects and subprograms can have default values. Formal types and
> packages cannot. Could someone point me to the discussion where this
> inconsistency was decided to be a good thing?
It is not a good thing.
- Bob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-02 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-02 17:21 default formal parameters in generic declarations Eric Hughes
2008-03-02 17:42 ` Robert A Duff [this message]
2008-03-02 19:40 ` Eric Hughes
2008-03-03 9:17 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2008-03-03 11:15 ` Georg Bauhaus
2008-03-03 13:56 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2008-03-04 16:15 ` Eric Hughes
2008-03-04 3:43 ` Randy Brukardt
2008-03-04 16:51 ` Eric Hughes
2008-03-04 18:43 ` Randy Brukardt
2008-03-05 21:08 ` Eric Hughes
2008-03-06 9:32 ` Georg Bauhaus
2008-03-06 18:05 ` Eric Hughes
2008-03-06 22:41 ` Ludovic Brenta
2008-03-07 10:51 ` Georg Bauhaus
2008-03-07 20:09 ` Eric Hughes
2008-03-03 12:42 ` Stephen Leake
2008-03-04 13:50 ` Dr. Adrian Wrigley
2008-03-04 16:56 ` Eric Hughes
2008-03-04 16:44 ` Eric Hughes
2008-03-05 13:11 ` Stephen Leake
2008-03-05 21:41 ` Eric Hughes
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox