From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@world.std.com>
Subject: Re: Bizarre JGNAT things
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 20:34:53 GMT
Date: 2001-04-05T20:34:53+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <wccr8z7jdaq.fsf@world.std.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 9agq05$qs7$1@news.netmar.com
gary_the_fox@richmond.com writes:
>
> Hello!
> Sure, I agree with all you say:-).
> However, the things I've described in the original are most likely a small bug
> in JGNAT. The problem is that if the compiler seemingly behaves erroneously
> if the compilation unit uses a package named, for instance, X and its own
> package name is of the form P1.P2.....X....P. For instance, the units that
> couldn't be compiled were child of COM.SUN.JAVA package and used JAVA top-
> level package. If I moved the code into a package that is not a child package
> of P1...JAVA, everything was OK. Since after the analysis of RM I've found no
> indication that this is illegal in Ada, it looks like a bug (Please, correct
> me if I'm wrong).
You would have to post the exact code to be sure.
But it sounds like you were hiding something called Java with another
name Java.
- Bob
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-04-05 20:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-03-31 22:13 Bizarre JGNAT things gary_the_fox
2001-04-01 17:40 ` Andrzej Lewandowski
2001-04-02 12:40 ` Marc A. Criley
2001-04-05 3:49 ` gary_the_fox
2001-04-05 20:34 ` Robert A Duff [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox