From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Subject: Re: pragma Pack vs. Convention C, portability issue?
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:46:42 -0500
Date: 2008-01-11T17:46:42-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <wccr6got1yl.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: fm8e95$q0u$1@jacob-sparre.dk
"Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com> writes:
> The ARG has argued similar questions as part of AI05-0012. And when I say
> argue, I meant it -- this was one of the most contentious issues that I can
> remember in the ARG.
Sometimes, it seems the contention is inversely proportional to
the importance of the topic. ;-)
- Bob
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-11 22:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-09 8:40 pragma Pack vs. Convention C, portability issue? okellogg
2008-01-09 16:06 ` Adam Beneschan
2008-01-09 22:12 ` Robert A Duff
2008-01-11 4:15 ` Randy Brukardt
2008-01-11 19:17 ` Randy Brukardt
2008-01-11 4:15 ` Randy Brukardt
2008-01-11 4:15 ` Randy Brukardt
2008-01-10 5:53 ` okellogg
2008-01-11 4:20 ` Randy Brukardt
2008-01-11 19:53 ` (see below)
2008-01-12 0:35 ` Adam Beneschan
2008-01-12 4:58 ` Randy Brukardt
2008-01-11 22:46 ` Robert A Duff [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox