From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Subject: Re: Subprogram Pointer in a Generic
Date: 22 Apr 2003 17:17:52 -0400
Date: 2003-04-22T17:17:52-04:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <wccof2yi64f.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3EA56F02.5090806@cogeco.ca
"Warren W. Gay VE3WWG" <ve3wwg@cogeco.ca> writes:
> I think so. I found this to be a horrible limitation when it
> was necessary to register a callback from within a generic.
Why? Declaring something in the private part of the generic package is
roughly the same thing as putting it in the body. It's not *exactly*
the same, but close enough.
And it has little effect on compile times, if the compiler is not
sharing code (which is the usual case).
- Bob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-22 21:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-17 1:53 Subprogram Pointer in a Generic Charles H. Sampson
2003-04-17 2:54 ` James S. Rogers
2003-04-17 3:15 ` Samuel Tardieu
2003-04-17 5:27 ` tmoran
2003-04-17 3:12 ` Samuel Tardieu
2003-04-17 4:17 ` tmoran
2003-04-17 20:24 ` Robert A Duff
2003-04-18 2:59 ` Charles H. Sampson
2003-04-22 16:34 ` Warren W. Gay VE3WWG
2003-04-22 21:17 ` Robert A Duff [this message]
2003-04-23 20:46 ` Warren W. Gay VE3WWG
2003-04-17 19:41 ` Matthew Heaney
2003-04-17 20:39 ` Robert A Duff
2003-04-17 23:14 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox