From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Subject: Re: Protected types and visibility of their internals
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 12:13:33 -0400
Date: 2008-07-08T12:13:33-04:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <wccod5873rm.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: b1f2203b-ed02-4031-bcba-40c0e1b1be07@j22g2000hsf.googlegroups.com
Maciej Sobczak <see.my.homepage@gmail.com> writes:
> Consider a protected type in some package:
>
> package P is
> protected type PT is
> procedure Foo;
> private
> X : Some_Type;
> end PT;
> end P;
>
> The protected type has a component X of Some_Type, which is entirely
> the private business of the protected type.
>
> Where this type should be declared?
I don't think there's any good solution to this.
You could put it in a nested package called Private_Stuff,
with a comment saying clients shouldn't mess with it.
> What is the rationale for this?
I don't remember exactly, but I think there are anomalies if you start
allowing types to be declared inside types.
- Bob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-08 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-08 9:57 Protected types and visibility of their internals Maciej Sobczak
2008-07-08 12:52 ` Georg Bauhaus
2008-07-08 16:13 ` Robert A Duff [this message]
2008-07-09 7:53 ` christoph.grein
2008-07-08 21:03 ` Randy Brukardt
2008-07-10 21:49 ` Maciej Sobczak
2008-07-09 5:04 ` christoph.grein
2008-07-09 13:44 ` Maciej Sobczak
2008-07-09 15:12 ` Adam Beneschan
2008-07-09 22:19 ` Stephen Leake
2008-07-09 22:38 ` Adam Beneschan
2008-07-10 0:18 ` Randy Brukardt
2008-07-10 0:18 ` Randy Brukardt
2008-07-09 23:22 ` jimmaureenrogers
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox