From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Subject: Re: Ensuring resource cleanup
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:47:51 -0500
Date: 2010-02-08T15:47:51-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <wccmxzjpi88.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 87tytr7f7h.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de
Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> writes:
> * Robert A. Duff:
>
>> To get rid of aborts, I think you need both No_Abort_Statements
>> and Max_Asynchronous_Select_Nesting => 0. I believe this will
>> cause the overhead of abort deferral to go away, but to be sure,
>> you should try it.
>
> Max_Asynchronous_Select_Nesting => 0 does indeed the trick.
Don't you need No_Abort_Statements as well?
>...I would
> never have guessed that, thanks.
You're welcome. What goes on at run time for a select-then-abort
is very similar to what goes on for aborting a task. Deferring
aborts applies to both.
- Bob
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-08 20:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-08 14:16 Ensuring resource cleanup Florian Weimer
2010-02-08 15:29 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2010-02-08 15:31 ` Robert A Duff
2010-02-08 16:01 ` Florian Weimer
2010-02-08 16:18 ` Robert A Duff
2010-02-08 18:30 ` Florian Weimer
2010-02-08 20:47 ` Robert A Duff [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox