From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Subject: Re: Finalization of a record containing a task
Date: 17 Feb 2005 19:13:36 -0500
Date: 2005-02-17T19:13:36-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <wccll9mu3m7.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: dlxq8h3dif5p.hvhx6u2sp11k$.dlg@40tude.net
"Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> writes:
>... (Hypothetically, if there were
> class-wide destructors, one would be able to do that.)
Sounds interesting. Can you give details of what you mean?
>... So in most cases one
> is forced to use access-to-task components rather than plain task ones.
Yes, but if you declare the object in a library package, you'll
still have the same problem with finalization happening too late.
- Bob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-18 0:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-16 20:35 Finalization of a record containing a task Bj?rn
2005-02-16 20:49 ` Stephen Leake
2005-02-16 21:20 ` Adrien Plisson
2005-02-16 22:09 ` Robert A Duff
2005-02-17 8:24 ` Adrien Plisson
2005-02-18 0:17 ` Robert A Duff
2005-02-17 9:13 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2005-02-18 0:13 ` Robert A Duff [this message]
2005-02-18 2:34 ` Randy Brukardt
2005-02-18 11:27 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2005-02-16 22:08 ` Robert A Duff
2005-02-21 13:20 ` Craig Carey
2005-02-21 21:41 ` Robert A Duff
2005-02-22 0:15 ` Randy Brukardt
2005-02-17 17:50 ` Bj?rn
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox