From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Subject: Re: Elaboration in GNAT
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 13:35:17 GMT
Date: 2002-01-11T13:35:17+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <wcck7up80yy.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 5ee5b646.0201102049.482cf72e@posting.google.com
dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) writes:
> I understand that this is theoretically true, but in practice with
> GNAT's static model problems do not arise.
> We have not had one customer using the static model ever
> run into any elaboration problems at all.
I skept. That is, I think you should say, "We have not had one customer
REPORT TO US ...." :-)
- Bob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-11 13:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-28 12:34 Elaboration in GNAT Frode Tenneboe
2001-11-28 18:13 ` Mark Johnson
2001-11-29 3:44 ` Robert Dewar
2001-11-29 13:30 ` Stephen Leake
2001-11-28 19:25 ` Robert Dewar
2002-01-04 13:21 ` Frode Tenneboe
2002-01-04 15:07 ` Matthew Heaney
2002-01-05 0:43 ` Robert Dewar
2002-01-05 0:50 ` Robert Dewar
2002-01-07 17:22 ` Mark Johnson
2002-01-08 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2002-01-10 21:54 ` Robert A Duff
2002-01-11 4:49 ` Robert Dewar
2002-01-11 13:35 ` Robert A Duff [this message]
2002-01-11 19:18 ` Robert Dewar
2002-01-16 11:48 ` Arnaud Charlet
2002-01-05 0:40 ` Robert Dewar
2002-01-07 13:28 ` Frode Tenneboe
2002-01-11 19:25 ` Robert Dewar
2001-11-29 13:13 ` Stephen Leake
2001-11-29 13:17 ` Stephen Leake
2001-11-30 12:44 ` Simon Wright
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox