comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@world.std.com>
Subject: Re: Inheritance and Polymorphism in Ada !!
Date: 1999/10/20
Date: 1999-10-20T00:00:00+00:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <wcchfjmx7y5.fsf@world.std.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 7uitmi$2vg$1@nnrp1.deja.com

Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com> writes:

> I like the extra level of indentation, it shows clearly the
> scope of the variables that are introduced.

Well, I suppose this is a matter of taste, to some extent.

But why do you dislike this:

    for I in Some_String'Range loop
        X: Character renames Some_String(I); -- Not legal Ada.
        X := To_Lower(X);
        ... maybe other uses of X ...
    end loop;

?

It seems clear enough (to me) that the scope of X is the body of the
loop.  There's *already* a level of indentation indicating that fact, so
why do you like to have an *extra* one?

Another example: I often want to add a statement at the beginning of a
procedure.  I want it to happen before anything else.  Maybe a debugging
print-out, for example.  Or maybe some sort of checking on the input
parameters, like an assertion.  If I put it after the "begin", I will
miss all the elaborations.  So I have to surround the whole procedure
with a block statement, and *then* add my new statement.  I wouldn't
mind adding the verbosity if it helped the reader, but I think it does
just the opposite.

- Bob
-- 
Change robert to bob to get my real email address.  Sorry.




  reply	other threads:[~1999-10-20  0:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1999-10-15  0:00 Inheritance and Polymorphism in Ada !! Chango Cho
1999-10-15  0:00 ` Ted Dennison
1999-10-15  0:00 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
1999-10-15  0:00 ` Andreas Winckler
1999-10-15  0:00   ` tmoran
1999-10-15  0:00     ` tmoran
1999-10-15  0:00   ` Richard D Riehle
1999-10-15  0:00     ` Matthew Heaney
1999-10-15  0:00       ` Richard D Riehle
1999-10-18  0:00       ` Robert A Duff
1999-10-19  0:00         ` Robert Dewar
1999-10-20  0:00           ` Robert A Duff [this message]
1999-10-21  0:00             ` Simon Wright
1999-10-21  0:00               ` Robert A Duff
1999-10-21  0:00             ` Paul Duquennoy
1999-10-21  0:00             ` Robert Dewar
1999-10-22  0:00         ` Matthew Heaney
1999-10-18  0:00       ` Robert Dewar
1999-10-23  0:00         ` Richard D Riehle
1999-10-24  0:00           ` Robert Dewar
1999-10-24  0:00             ` Brian Rogoff
1999-10-26  0:00               ` Robert Dewar
1999-10-25  0:00             ` Robert A Duff
1999-10-26  0:00               ` Robert Dewar
1999-10-26  0:00                 ` Robert A Duff
1999-10-15  0:00   ` Stephane Barbey
1999-10-15  0:00   ` Matthew Heaney
1999-10-18  0:00     ` Robert A Duff
1999-10-18  0:00       ` Brian Rogoff
1999-10-15  0:00   ` Lutz Donnerhacke
1999-10-18  0:00   ` Robert A Duff
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox