From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@world.std.com>
Subject: Re: Propagation of unhandled exceptions during elaboration, in a tasking program
Date: 1999/11/02
Date: 1999-11-02T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <wcchfj4yg37.fsf@world.std.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 7vmj34$oc2$1@nnrp1.deja.com
Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com> writes:
> Why the latter, this is most certainly not a target or
> implementation specific issue, but just one of standard
> Ada semantics (waiting for task termination).
But the issue was whether an error message got printed, and I don't
think the RM has anything to say about that. To me, it seems friendly
to print the message *before* doing any task waiting. After all, the
program might well wait forever, since the main procedure never causes
some tasks to go ahead. Of course, it's not sensible to print *any*
messages on many embedded systems.
Also, there's an obscure Implementation Permission in 10.2(30), which
*allows* the implementation to abort all the tasks in this situation.
I don't think any implementations actually do that.
- Bob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-11-02 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-11-01 0:00 Propagation of unhandled exceptions during elaboration, in a tasking program David C. Hoos, Sr.
1999-11-01 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-11-02 0:00 ` Nick Roberts
1999-11-02 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-11-02 0:00 ` Robert A Duff [this message]
1999-11-02 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox