From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Subject: Re: volatile vs aliased
Date: 06 Oct 2005 15:37:47 -0400
Date: 2005-10-06T15:37:47-04:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <wcchdbufnck.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Tce1f.7722$oc.146@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net
"Jeffrey R. Carter" <spam@spam.com> writes:
> Of course, if the C function has both pointer parameters and returns a
> value, access parameters are the only thing available. Is ease of
> interfacing to other languages another pro for allowing out and in out
> parameters for functions, along with making side effects visible?
Yes! And that argument was brought up during the Ada 9X design.
Apparently, it didn't convince people.
- Bob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-06 19:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-05 15:22 volatile vs aliased REH
2005-10-05 18:22 ` Ludovic Brenta
2005-10-05 18:39 ` REH
2005-10-05 19:46 ` Ludovic Brenta
2005-10-05 20:02 ` REH
2005-10-05 20:11 ` Ludovic Brenta
2005-10-05 20:20 ` REH
2005-10-06 5:21 ` Ludovic Brenta
2005-10-05 20:55 ` Simon Wright
2005-10-06 18:32 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2005-10-05 23:38 ` Randy Brukardt
2005-10-06 0:02 ` tmoran
2005-10-06 13:40 ` REH
2005-10-06 23:52 ` Randy Brukardt
2005-10-06 18:40 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2005-10-06 19:37 ` Robert A Duff [this message]
2005-10-06 23:56 ` Randy Brukardt
2005-10-06 19:08 ` REH
2005-10-06 19:21 ` Ed Falis
2005-10-06 19:37 ` REH
2005-10-06 19:46 ` Robert A Duff
2005-10-06 8:05 ` Martin Krischik
2005-10-06 8:52 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2005-10-06 11:36 ` Rolf
2005-10-06 18:43 ` Björn Persson
2005-10-06 19:03 ` Niklas Holsti
2005-10-07 6:36 ` Martin Krischik
2005-10-07 6:33 ` Martin Krischik
2005-10-07 15:56 ` Adrian Knoth
2005-10-07 18:48 ` Martin Krischik
2005-10-07 22:44 ` REH
2005-10-08 6:10 ` Simon Wright
2005-10-17 2:16 ` Dave Thompson
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox