Re: BLAS

[Robert A Duff <bobduff@world.std.com>]

Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com> writes:

> Yup, that's definitely true, I am not sure why one needs to
> reference the AARM here, the deal is simply that a subtype
> mark is a name, and an attribute reference is a name, so this
> does indeed look like a bug

Well, I suppose one never *needs* to reference the AARM, assuming one
can imagine all the consequences of the RM in one's head (and assuming
the RM has no bugs ;-)).  The AARM in this case says what you said above
-- apparently whoever wrote that paragraph thought it was not obvious
from the RM (even though it of course follows from the RM).

- Bob