From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@world.std.com>
Subject: Re: task activation
Date: 1999/12/06
Date: 1999-12-06T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <wccemd0m5ez.fsf@world.std.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 82fbr9$jqm$1@nnrp1.deja.com
Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com> writes:
> Suppress elaboration checks in the task body if you know the
> body is not executed till after elaboration is complete.
I don't understand this one. What effect does this have on the static
elab method? I thought that if you use the static elab method, you
wouldn't get any checks at all, so what's the point of suppressing them?
- Bob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-12-06 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-11-20 0:00 task activation Matthew Heaney
1999-11-21 0:00 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
1999-11-22 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1999-11-22 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-11-23 0:00 ` Mats Weber
1999-11-23 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-12-02 0:00 ` Ehud Lamm
1999-12-03 0:00 ` Simon Wright
1999-12-06 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-12-06 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-12-06 0:00 ` Robert A Duff [this message]
1999-12-06 0:00 ` Simon Wright
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-12-21 11:58 Task activation tonyg
2011-12-21 12:27 ` tonyg
2011-12-21 12:31 ` AdaMagica
2011-12-21 12:35 ` Niklas Holsti
2011-12-22 8:26 ` tonyg
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox