From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@world.std.com>
Subject: Re: huge executable??
Date: 2000/05/16
Date: 2000-05-16T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <wccem72tz4n.fsf@world.std.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 8fpu0g$a3e$1@nnrp1.deja.com
Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com> writes:
> Elimination of unused code will most certainly reduce executable
> size but it won't help one bit in reducing cache pressure, since
> obviously unused code never gets into the cache during
> execution.
What about paging?
- Bob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-05-16 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-05-13 0:00 huge executable?? David Dousette
2000-05-14 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-05-14 0:00 ` tmoran
2000-05-15 0:00 ` Roger Barnett
2000-05-15 0:00 ` DELCOURT J�r�me
2000-05-15 0:00 ` Gisle S�lensminde
2000-05-15 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-05-15 0:00 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
2000-05-15 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-05-16 0:00 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
2000-05-16 0:00 ` tmoran
2000-05-16 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-05-16 0:00 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
2000-05-16 0:00 ` tmoran
2000-05-16 0:00 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
2000-05-16 0:00 ` Geoff Bull
2000-05-16 0:00 ` huge executable?? - worry no more Tom Hargraves
2000-05-16 0:00 ` Gautier
2000-05-16 0:00 ` Marin D. Condic
2000-05-16 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-05-19 0:00 ` Richard D Riehle
2000-05-19 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
2000-05-16 0:00 ` Martin Dowie
2000-05-18 0:00 ` huge executable?? (null)
2000-05-16 0:00 ` Robert A Duff [this message]
2000-05-16 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
2000-05-16 0:00 ` Gautier
2000-05-16 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
2000-05-17 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
2000-05-16 0:00 ` Florian Weimer
2000-05-16 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-05-16 0:00 ` Gautier
2000-05-16 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-05-15 0:00 ` David Starner
2000-05-19 0:00 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
2000-05-14 0:00 ` Gautier
2000-05-14 0:00 ` David Dousette
2000-05-14 0:00 ` Gautier
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox