From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Subject: Re: Not null feature with anonymous and named access types
Date: 17 Jun 2006 10:24:28 -0400
Date: 2006-06-17T10:24:28-04:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <wccejxng8rn.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: UuWdnd62cYlGxQ7ZnZ2dnUVZ_r6dnZ2d@megapath.net
"Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com> writes:
> This is doubly wrong: "not null" is *not* a constraint ...
True, but does anybody besides a language lawyer need to care?
- Bob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-17 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-12 20:33 Not null feature with anonymous and named access types Anh Vo
2006-06-12 21:26 ` Björn Persson
2006-06-12 23:13 ` Anh Vo
2006-06-13 7:53 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-06-13 15:27 ` Anh Vo
2006-06-14 15:13 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2006-06-14 15:37 ` Anh Vo
2006-06-14 17:00 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-06-15 3:48 ` Anh Vo
2006-06-15 8:21 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-06-17 1:21 ` Randy Brukardt
2006-06-17 8:24 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-06-17 14:24 ` Robert A Duff [this message]
2006-06-19 23:17 ` Randy Brukardt
2006-06-15 10:50 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2006-06-17 1:16 ` Randy Brukardt
2006-06-17 14:25 ` Robert A Duff
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox