From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Subject: Re: "autocode" vs "intermediate code"
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 12:10:35 -0500
Date: 2007-02-20T12:10:35-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <wccejok69h0.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: ur6slkoje.fsf_-_@stephe-leake.org
Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org> writes:
> The proper question is whether the Ada original source for the
> navigation is more readable than the MatrixX original source for the
> GNC.
Another proper question is: To what extent does one need to look at the
generated Ada code for analysis/understanding/debugging/etc?
If the answer is "not at all", then you don't need to care how
readable the Ada code is. I don't know anything about MatrixX...
- Bob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-20 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-17 23:41 Ada downsizing in space R. B. Love
2007-02-18 14:58 ` Jeffrey Creem
2007-02-18 17:15 ` R.B. Love
2007-02-18 18:20 ` Jeffrey Creem
2007-02-18 23:25 ` Björn Persson
[not found] ` <PM000429CA00A4EABE@tilopa.unknown.dom>
2007-02-19 1:13 ` Ed Falis
2007-02-20 2:15 ` R. B. Love
2007-02-20 12:21 ` "autocode" vs "intermediate code" Stephen Leake
2007-02-20 15:41 ` Ed Falis
2007-02-21 1:11 ` Britt Snodgrass
2007-02-21 12:57 ` Ed Falis
2007-02-20 17:10 ` Robert A Duff [this message]
2007-02-21 1:36 ` Upkeep
2007-02-20 15:41 ` Ada downsizing in space Ed Falis
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox