From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@world.std.com>
Subject: Re: ObjectAda - no clock drift!
Date: 1998/06/17
Date: 1998-06-17T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <wccbtrrpwle.fsf@world.std.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 6m904m$vv0$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com
dennison@telepath.com writes:
> I guess I was mostly posting this to see if this is a just a farcical non-
> compliance with the documentation standard, or if I'm misunderstanding the
> standard.
I think the Documentation Requirements in the RM shouldn't be there at
all. You can't legislate good documentation. If you try, you get the
sort of documentation you're complaining about -- totally useless
information, intended purely to satisfy the letter of the law.
Note that the validation process makes no attempt to verify that
Documentation Requirements are met properly. If the vendor had written,
"Humpty Dumpty sat on a wall" as the answer to that question, they would
still be just as validated.
- Bob
--
Change robert to bob to get my real email address. Sorry.
--
Change robert to bob to get my real email address. Sorry.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1998-06-17 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <6m6f0t$1ue$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
1998-06-17 0:00 ` ObjectAda - no clock drift! Larry Kilgallen
1998-06-17 0:00 ` Corey Ashford
1998-06-17 0:00 ` dennison
1998-06-17 0:00 ` Robert A Duff [this message]
1998-06-18 0:00 ` dennison
1998-06-18 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1998-06-18 0:00 ` tedennison
1998-06-17 0:00 ` Christopher Green
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox