From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@world.std.com>
Subject: Re: Wrap-Up (was Re: Unchecked_Conversion on different sized types -- problem?)
Date: 2000/01/15
Date: 2000-01-15T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <wccaem7cb3o.fsf@world.std.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: ETSf4.273$541.8047@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net
"Matthew Heaney" <matthew_heaney@acm.org> writes:
> Compilar writers: if we use a little function to call the allocator, ie
>
> function "+" (S : String) return String_Access is
> begin
> return new String'(S);
> end;
>
> Table : constant String_Table :=
> (A => +"this is a test",
> B => +"of the emergency",
> C => +"broadcast sytsem");
> begin
>
> then is the allocation still done statically?
My guess is: Yes, if "+" has a pragma Inline, otherwise no.
- Bob
prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-01-15 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-01-13 0:00 Unchecked_Conversion on different sized types -- problem? Mike Silva
2000-01-13 0:00 ` Bryce Bardin
2000-01-13 0:00 ` Mike Silva
2000-01-13 0:00 ` Mike Silva
2000-01-14 0:00 ` Bryce Bardin
2000-01-14 0:00 ` Mike Silva
2000-01-14 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
2000-01-13 0:00 ` Jim Rogers
2000-01-13 0:00 ` Mike Silva
2000-01-13 0:00 ` James S. Rogers
2000-01-13 0:00 ` reason67
2000-01-14 0:00 ` Jeff Carter
2000-01-14 0:00 ` Keith Thompson
2000-01-16 0:00 ` David A. Cobb
2000-01-14 0:00 ` Vladimir Olensky
2000-01-14 0:00 ` Werner Pachler
2000-01-14 0:00 ` Bryce Bardin
2000-01-14 0:00 ` reason67
2000-01-14 0:00 ` Wrap-Up (was Re: Unchecked_Conversion on different sized types -- problem?) Mike Silva
2000-01-15 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
2000-01-15 0:00 ` Robert A Duff [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox