From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@world.std.com>
Subject: Re: Operator visibility question
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 20:15:29 GMT
Date: 2001-06-03T20:15:29+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <wccae3pfhge.fsf@world.std.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3b1a5cb5_4@news.arrakis.es
"Nacho Robledo" <rrilNOSPAMpm@arrakis.es> writes:
> I am not a good ada programmer but try this piece of code:
>
> C: constant Boolean := MT."<"(A+2,B);
No, please don't. A good style rule is to never use this notation -- if
you have a binary operator, always use infix notation. Say "use type"
if necessary to make that legal.
> I am not sure if this will run well but i think is the most common thing you
> can do....
- Bob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-06-03 20:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-06-03 13:48 Operator visibility question Rod Chapman
2001-06-03 14:19 ` Jeff Creem
2001-06-03 15:47 ` Nacho Robledo
2001-06-03 20:15 ` Robert A Duff [this message]
2001-06-04 15:24 ` Rod Chapman
2001-06-04 17:55 ` Nacho Robledo
2001-06-04 21:27 ` Ted Dennison
2001-06-03 16:34 ` Florian Weimer
2001-06-04 15:52 ` Ted Dennison
2001-06-04 22:12 ` Florian Weimer
2001-06-05 12:24 ` Rod Chapman
2001-06-03 20:13 ` Robert A Duff
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox