From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Subject: Re: Requeue in GNAT 3.14p (Linux)
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 19:20:47 GMT
Date: 2002-06-19T19:20:47+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <wccadpr5b3k.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: ud6unjqkx.fsf@wanadoo.fr
Pascal Obry <p.obry@wanadoo.fr> writes:
> You can't have IO in a protected object. Does it hang if you remove the IO ?
But doesn't GNAT claim to support IO in protected objects
(even though the RM says it's a bounded error)?
I don't see anything wrong with that pattern of requeues,
other than the IO. Unless I'm missing something...
- Bob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-19 19:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-19 13:17 Requeue in GNAT 3.14p (Linux) Dmitry A. Kazakov
2002-06-19 14:22 ` Pascal Obry
2002-06-19 19:20 ` Robert A Duff [this message]
2002-06-20 7:11 ` Dmitry A.Kazakov
2002-06-19 14:45 ` Anatoly Chernyshev
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox