Re: Elaboration of nested generic package.

[Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com>]

"Jean-Pierre Rosen" <rosen@adalog.fr> writes:

> "Robert I. Eachus" <rieachus@attbi.com> a �crit dans le message de news:3F0CF0AE.5030409@attbi.com...
> > Oops! Silly me! We fixed that one, the pragma is now necessary if you
> > intend to provide a body, if the body is not otherwise required.  (Why
> > would you want to do that?  I don't know.  But there is a way to do it
> > if necessary.)
> 
> A package that declares only tasks in the body comes to mind....

Yes.  Also, another case comes to mind: you want to declare a type
extension in a package body, where the package spec is totally empty.
The Initialize operation might register objects of the type into some
global data structure.  Nobody calls the operations of this type
directly, but only via dispatching.

- Bob