From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Subject: Re: ada loops
Date: 31 May 2003 12:21:21 -0400
Date: 2003-05-31T12:21:21-04:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <wcc7k87kry6.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: AdRBa.16086$sJ4.13161@newsfep4-winn.server.ntli.net
"chris.danx" <spamoff.danx@ntlworld.com> writes:
> Simon Wright wrote:
>
> >>There is no version of gdb that is Ada aware.
> > I don't understand, clearly you're making a point but I have no idea
> > what it is.
>
> Perhaps it is that there is no Ada aware gdb, but there is a GNAT aware
> gdb? I tend to associate debuggers with implementations not languages,
> but I could be wrong...
No, I was not complaining that the gdb distributed with GNAT is
GNAT-specific. That's to be expected. I was complaining that
it is not as "Ada aware" as the Ada compiler.
- Bob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-31 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-30 15:44 ada loops Roman V. Isaev
2003-05-30 16:00 ` Bill Findlay
2003-05-30 16:17 ` Robert A Duff
2003-05-30 16:46 ` Bill Findlay
2003-05-30 16:51 ` Bill Findlay
2003-05-30 17:25 ` Stephen Leake
2003-05-30 19:40 ` Robert A Duff
2003-05-30 21:33 ` Pascal Obry
2003-05-31 16:19 ` Robert A Duff
2003-05-31 16:29 ` Robert A Duff
2003-05-30 21:38 ` Simon Wright
2003-05-30 21:51 ` chris.danx
2003-05-31 6:40 ` Pascal Obry
2003-05-31 16:21 ` Robert A Duff [this message]
2003-06-02 16:39 ` Stephen Leake
2003-05-31 16:24 ` Oliver Kellogg
2003-05-31 23:15 ` Preben Randhol
2003-06-05 5:14 ` Dave Thompson
2003-06-05 18:15 ` Stephen Leake
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox