From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Subject: Re: Interfaces and abstract tagged types
Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2008 16:29:36 -0400
Date: 2008-10-05T16:29:36-04:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <wcc63o623bj.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1w8x4i0peinwk$.16cenhvch5kv5.dlg@40tude.net
"Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> writes:
> On Sun, 05 Oct 2008 07:01:31 GMT, Dale Stanbrough wrote:
>
>> I was wondering what the magical incantation is to have an abtract
>> tagged null record (or abstract tagged private) also implement an
>> Interface.
>>
>> I've tried various combinations reserved words, all without much luck!
>
> type X is limited interface;
> type Y is abstract tagged null record;
> type Z is abstract new Y and X with null record;
Yes, or:
type A is limited interface;
type B is new A with null record;
> (Interfaces was a huge mistake)
Interesting. Why do you say so?
- Bob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-05 20:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-05 7:01 Interfaces and abstract tagged types Dale Stanbrough
2008-10-05 7:43 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2008-10-05 20:29 ` Robert A Duff [this message]
2008-10-06 8:25 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2008-10-16 7:51 ` Ivan Levashew
2008-10-16 8:29 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2008-10-16 9:23 ` Ivan Levashew
2008-10-16 10:05 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2008-10-16 10:27 ` Georg Bauhaus
2008-10-16 12:21 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2008-10-16 13:35 ` Georg Bauhaus
2008-10-16 14:30 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2008-10-23 6:39 ` Ivan Levashew
2008-10-25 8:57 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox