From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@world.std.com>
Subject: Re: Apex 3.0.0b can't handle dynamic positional agregates?
Date: 1999/10/12
Date: 1999-10-12T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <wcc4sfw4p3p.fsf@world.std.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 7tt8h4$mis@newsserv.vs.dasa.de
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 481 bytes --]
"Dr. Joachim Schr�er" <joachim.schroeer@vs.dasa.de> writes:
> To be serious: By sovereignly ignoring language standards, Rational seems to
> intentionally bring some C++ habits to the Ada world.
That's not fair. In Ada 83, there *was* no standard way to do unsigned
integers, so it's not surprising that Rational invented one. Now, of
course, they have to keep supporting it, for upward compatibility.
- Bob
--
Change robert to bob to get my real email address. Sorry.
next parent reply other threads:[~1999-10-12 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <37FE1232.EB0AD5EE@boeing.com>
[not found] ` <7tt8h4$mis@newsserv.vs.dasa.de>
1999-10-12 0:00 ` Robert A Duff [this message]
1999-10-12 0:00 ` Apex 3.0.0b can't handle dynamic positional agregates? Samuel T. Harris
1999-10-14 0:00 ` Martin Dowie
1999-10-14 0:00 ` Wes Groleau
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox