From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Subject: Re: Visibility of private packages??
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 13:30:45 GMT
Date: 2002-07-31T13:30:45+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <wcc3cu0hvne.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: dstanbro-8DD764.22063931072002@news-server.bigpond.net.au
Dale Stanbrough <dstanbro@bigpond.net.au> writes:
> Yes, that's correct. I think this is a case where the designers got it
> wrong. The current rules prevent "compilation coupling", that is any
> change to a private package will never result in the need to recompile
> a package outside of the hierachy.
Isn't the ARG considering relaxing this rule?
- Bob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-31 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-30 21:23 Visibility of private packages?? Peter Coventry
2002-07-31 9:13 ` John McCabe
2002-07-31 12:06 ` Dale Stanbrough
2002-07-31 13:30 ` Robert A Duff [this message]
2002-08-14 1:16 ` Randy Brukardt
2002-08-14 9:53 ` Dale Stanbrough
2002-08-14 17:03 ` Robert Dewar
2002-08-14 19:42 ` Randy Brukardt
2002-07-31 11:55 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2002-07-31 13:22 ` Mark Doherty
2002-07-31 17:43 ` Anh_Vo
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox