From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Subject: Re: A question about syntax or semantics
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 18:58:45 -0400
Date: 2014-05-19T18:58:45-04:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <wcc38g5e5p6.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: lldtft$3su$1@loke.gir.dk
"Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com> writes:
> Ergo (3), the question seems contrived, since there isn't any other sensible
> option. That's more of a characteristic of an exam question than a real
> question.
It seems pretty stupid, as an exam question. I mean, the answer is,
"Nothing else makes sense." (which Adam explored in detail).
I'd be tempted to answer with a challenge: "How would _you_ do it?",
which isn't a good way to pass an exam. ;-)
- Bob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-19 22:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-17 22:56 A question about syntax or semantics Victor Porton
2014-05-17 23:05 ` Bill Findlay
2014-05-18 2:47 ` Brad Moore
2014-05-18 10:48 ` Simon Wright
2014-05-18 14:40 ` [OT] Assembly language syntax, was: " Simon Clubley
2014-05-18 14:50 ` Simon Wright
2014-05-19 17:02 ` Adam Beneschan
2014-05-19 21:35 ` Randy Brukardt
2014-05-19 22:05 ` Bill Findlay
2014-05-19 22:58 ` Robert A Duff [this message]
2014-05-20 8:01 ` Georg Bauhaus
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox