From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@world.std.com>
Subject: Re: ADA Exception Handling
Date: 1998/10/29
Date: 1998-10-29T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <wcc1znrhqu1.fsf@world.std.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 719anr$bko$1@usenet.rational.com
"Corey Ashford" <corey@remove.these.four.words.rational.com> writes:
> For example, in C++, an exception can be reraised from outside the exception
> handler (a.k.a catch block) - for example in a function which is
> called by the handler. This
> isn't possible in Ada.
It is possible in Ada, using exception occurrences and the
Ada.Exceptions package.
I agree that for the most part, Ada and C++ exceptions are more-or-less
the same.
I'd say the biggest difference between Ada and C++ exceptions is that
C++ allows you to add information to an exception occurrence in a
type-safe way; that is, you declare that information at the point of the
exception *type*, and the raising and handling have to agree. You can
add information in Ada, too, but it's not type-safe -- you must encode
the information as a String. Sigh.
- Bob
--
Change robert to bob to get my real email address. Sorry.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1998-10-29 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1998-10-28 0:00 ADA Exception Handling Stefan Papp
1998-10-29 0:00 ` Corey Ashford
1998-10-29 0:00 ` Robert A Duff [this message]
1998-10-29 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1998-10-29 0:00 ` Corey Ashford
1998-10-29 0:00 ` Jerry van Dijk
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox