From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@world.std.com>
Subject: Re: DIANA
Date: 2000/06/01
Date: 2000-06-01T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <wcc1z2hl8y6.fsf@world.std.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: dMKY4.4126$fI2.14295@telenews.teleline.es
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 508 bytes --]
"Antonio Dur�n Dom�nguez" <andudo@teleline.es> writes:
> Is still DIANA used in todays Ada95 compilers?
I don't know of any compiler built from scratch for Ada 95 that uses
DIANA. There are some Ada 95 compilers that were built by upgrading Ada
83 compilers and that use a modified form of DIANA.
By the way, DIANA is not a very good design for a compiler intermediate
language, in my opinion.
By the way, ASIS meets many of the original goals of DIANA, using a
rather different approach.
- Bob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-06-01 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-05-30 0:00 DIANA Antonio Dur�n Dom�nguez
2000-06-01 0:00 ` DIANA Tucker Taft
2000-06-01 0:00 ` DIANA Keith Thompson
2000-06-01 0:00 ` Robert A Duff [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-12-18 5:46 DIANA patrick boulay
2008-12-18 9:23 ` DIANA Jean-Pierre Rosen
2008-12-18 11:16 ` DIANA patrick boulay
2008-12-18 12:29 ` DIANA Jean-Pierre Rosen
2008-12-18 16:07 ` DIANA Ira Baxter
2008-12-18 18:36 ` DIANA patrick boulay
2008-12-18 9:37 ` DIANA Markus Schoepflin
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox