From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen)
Subject: Re: Small question concerning use
Date: 17 Oct 2001 05:52:30 -0500
Date: 2001-10-17T05:52:30-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <wXrJpefhQrXs@eisner.encompasserve.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3BCCF185.A4512DDA@san.rr.com
In article <3BCCF185.A4512DDA@san.rr.com>, Darren New <dnew@san.rr.com> writes:
> tmoran@acm.org wrote:
>> OTOH, Ada.Streams.Stream_Element_Count was clearly designed with the
>> intention of "use Ada.Streams", in which case Stream_Element_Count
>> is very readable, while Ada.Streams.Stream_Element_Count is ugly.
>
> Right. My thought was that "always avoid use - it leads to ambiguities"
> is too sweeping a statement in the face of this sort of naming
> convention.
That is why not everybody supports that statement.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-17 10:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-15 22:28 Small question concerning use Eric Merritt
2001-10-16 6:34 ` Rename is much better Petter Fryklund
2001-10-16 12:28 ` Small question concerning use Marc A. Criley
2001-10-16 13:27 ` Ted Dennison
2001-10-16 19:31 ` Darren New
2001-10-16 20:26 ` Ted Dennison
2001-10-16 21:26 ` David Starner
2001-10-17 0:18 ` tmoran
2001-10-17 2:48 ` Darren New
2001-10-17 10:52 ` Larry Kilgallen [this message]
2001-10-17 13:48 ` Ted Dennison
2001-10-17 14:21 ` Ted Dennison
2001-10-16 20:35 ` Ted Dennison
2001-10-16 13:54 ` Marin David Condic
2001-10-18 18:46 ` Dr. Michael Paus
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox