From: "Björn Persson" <spam-away@nowhere.nil>
Subject: Re: Multi-arch
Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 21:24:44 GMT
Date: 2006-05-18T21:24:44+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <wC5bg.659$E02.248@newsb.telia.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1147857777.703653.268610@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
I understand how multi-arch is useful if you want to use proprietary
binaries that are available only for certain architectures. Otherwise I
don't see a reason to do it. I'd think free code would just be compiled
for the "native" architecture. Is multi-arch useful in an altogether
free system in some way that eludes me?
--
Bj�rn Persson PGP key A88682FD
omb jor ers @sv ge.
r o.b n.p son eri nu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-18 21:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-17 9:22 Multi-arch Ludovic Brenta
2006-05-17 9:45 ` Multi-arch Georg Bauhaus
2006-05-17 20:31 ` Multi-arch gshapovalov
2006-05-18 11:39 ` Multi-arch Ludovic Brenta
2006-05-18 16:34 ` Multi-arch gshapovalov
2006-05-18 21:24 ` Björn Persson [this message]
2006-05-19 7:23 ` Multi-arch Ludovic Brenta
2006-05-19 21:16 ` Multi-arch Björn Persson
2006-05-20 11:18 ` Multi-arch Ludovic Brenta
2006-05-20 17:51 ` Multi-arch Björn Persson
2006-05-21 16:03 ` Multi-arch Dr. Adrian Wrigley
2006-05-21 13:05 ` Multi-arch Dr. Adrian Wrigley
2006-05-21 13:41 ` Multi-arch Ludovic Brenta
2006-05-21 16:07 ` Multi-arch Dr. Adrian Wrigley
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox