Re: Creating a DLL in Ada

["Daniel Dudley" <dudley@online.no>]

"Larry Kilgallen" <Kilgallen@SpamCop.net> wrote in message
news:a157UXntK+J9@eisner.encompasserve.org...
> In article <aRhZ8.62$sR2.1275@news4.ulv.nextra.no>,
> "Daniel Dudley" <dudley@online.no> writes:
> > "Pascal Obry" <p.obry@wanadoo.fr> wrote in message
> > news:un0sqe73u.fsf@wanadoo.fr...
>
> >> My point was only that ACT can't be blamed for
> >> documentation badly built by volunteers :)
> >
> > A valid point, Pascal. However, ACT surely can be blamed
> > for the poor quality PS documentation, what? :-( Perhaps
> > it's a result of this wanting quality that forced the
> > creation of "unauthorized" PDF documentation.
>
> Authorize or unauthorized, the front page of the document
> should indicate the version of the software to which it
> applies.

Indeed it should, and does -- version 3.14p.

> If the user goes looking for a more recent version
> of the documentation in hopes that DLLs will be supported by
> the new version of the software, it is all to their advantage,
> even if only the documentation was enhanced in this regard.

Daniel