From: development-2006-8ecbb5cc8aREMOVETHIS@ANDTHATm-e-leypold.de (Markus E.L. 2)
Subject: Re: AW: To := Grein, Christoph (Fa. ESG)
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 00:28:45 +0200
Date: 2007-08-03T00:28:45+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <w0fy31o9k2.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: _afsi.14775$ax1.8291@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net
'Colossus DOT Pike AT worldnet DOT att DOT net (anon)' wrote:
> In <mailman.16.1185952313.3834.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>, "Grein, Christoph (Fa. ESG)" <Christoph.Grein@eurocopter.com> writes:
>>Anon,
>>
>>You seem to have a dogmatic attitude.
>
> -- --------------------------- --
> -- True programmers are that way! --
> -- --------------------------- --
True programmers aren't that way. True programmers go with the flow.
>>There were several posts correcting your claim that there is a compiler
>>bug, but you insisted.
>>
>
> Did they, now! What I saw was opions with a few agumenting that it
> should be legal or others trying to alter the Ada definitions. The post
Actually you saw at least two references to the ARM with proof that
your assertions where wrong.
> -- I did not see the True RM rule aka RM 4.4 ( 7 ) --
> -- with it example RM 4.5 ( 17 ) until I happen to --
The examples are certainly instructive, but my idea is that they
aren't normative. So I wouldn't rely on the examples (without
understanding which rule apply to them).
Regards -- Markus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-02 22:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-30 22:52 Unary operator after binary operator: legal or not? Jeffrey R. Carter
2007-07-30 23:39 ` Markus E.L.
2007-07-31 0:22 ` Adam Beneschan
2007-07-31 21:52 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2007-07-31 8:01 ` anon
2007-07-31 8:16 ` Unary operator after binary operator: legal or not? => Compiler Error anon
2007-07-31 8:38 ` AW: Unary operator after binary operator: legal or not? => CompilerError Grein, Christoph (Fa. ESG)
2007-07-31 15:05 ` Unary operator after binary operator: legal or not? => Compiler Error Robert A Duff
2007-07-31 15:39 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-07-31 15:53 ` Robert A Duff
2007-07-31 17:02 ` Georg Bauhaus
2007-07-31 19:17 ` Adam Beneschan
2007-08-01 7:16 ` Maciej Sobczak
2007-08-01 15:23 ` Adam Beneschan
2007-07-31 20:59 ` Robert A Duff
2007-08-01 7:24 ` Georg Bauhaus
2007-08-01 8:02 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-08-01 8:17 ` AW: Unary operator after binary operator: legal or not? => CompilerError Grein, Christoph (Fa. ESG)
2007-08-01 10:10 ` Ian Clifton
2007-08-01 9:34 ` Unary operator after binary operator: legal or not? => Compiler Error Georg Bauhaus
2007-08-01 21:51 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2007-07-31 17:52 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-08-02 20:44 ` Charles Lindsey
2007-08-03 7:48 ` Stuart
2007-08-03 7:51 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-07-31 23:22 ` anon
2007-08-01 0:13 ` Adam Beneschan
2007-08-01 6:20 ` Unary operator after binary operator: legal or not? => Illegal anon
2007-08-01 5:34 ` AW: Unary operator after binary operator: legal or not? => CompilerError Grein, Christoph (Fa. ESG)
2007-08-01 6:46 ` To := Grein, Christoph (Fa. ESG) anon
2007-08-01 7:11 ` AW: " Grein, Christoph (Fa. ESG)
2007-08-02 6:52 ` anon
2007-08-02 8:56 ` AW: " Grein, Christoph (Fa. ESG)
2007-08-02 22:29 ` Markus E.L. 2
2007-08-02 23:02 ` tmoran
2007-08-02 23:11 ` Ed Falis
2007-08-02 23:34 ` Markus E.L. 2
2007-08-03 4:42 ` AW: " Grein, Christoph (Fa. ESG)
2007-08-02 22:28 ` Markus E.L. 2 [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-08-02 10:17 Grein, Christoph (Fa. ESG)
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox