From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Subject: Re: Ada IDEs (was Re: Re-Marketing Ada)
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 14:49:35 -0600
Date: 2003-11-18T14:49:35-06:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <vrl1hudufvdv4d@corp.supernews.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: u4qx134n6.fsf_-_@nasa.gov
"Stephen Leake" <Stephe.Leake@nasa.gov> wrote in message
news:u4qx134n6.fsf_-_@nasa.gov...
> "Stephane Richard" <stephane.richard@verizon.net> writes:
>
> > OF course, before the GPS (Gnat programming system) thre also was
nothing
> > close to an integrated IDE for Ada either.
>
> Hmph. Emacs is the best IDE around, as well as being the oldest, and
> it supports Ada very well, and has for years.
And, besides that, Aonix and Rational have had extensive IDEs available for
many years. Even Janus/Ada has IDEs for years.
The only way to make the original statement true is to replace Ada by GNAT
(something a lot of people seem to do anyway), and then forget about EMACS,
AdaGide, etc.
Randy.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-18 20:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-18 18:36 Ada IDEs (was Re: Re-Marketing Ada) Stephen Leake
2003-11-18 20:48 ` Stephane Richard
2003-11-18 21:29 ` David C. Hoos
2003-11-18 21:54 ` Stephen Leake
2003-11-18 23:03 ` Georg Bauhaus
2003-11-19 16:56 ` Peter Hermann
2003-11-19 17:55 ` Stephen Leake
2003-11-18 20:49 ` Randy Brukardt [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox