From: Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de>
Subject: Re: Commentary on Industry Move to C++
Date: 29 Aug 2001 23:26:23 +0200
Date: 2001-08-29T23:26:23+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <vlmjm9.d51.ln@320025674319.dialin.t-online.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3B874691.65A75825@easystreet.com
Al Christians <achrist@easystreet.com> writes:
> They say it's because of timing -- ie because of garbage collection
> -- they can't make it a sure thing that it will accomplish anything
> in a given amount of time. But they also say that it's not an
> admission that it's likely to crash or give the wrong answers.
>
> That's really a JVM issue, not a Java issue -- there are many
> languages running on JVM these days.
Just a data point: Siemens is propagating Java for real time
development these days.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-08-29 21:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-24 0:29 Commentary on Industry Move to C++ Gary Scott
2001-08-24 2:49 ` Andrzej Lewandowski
2001-08-24 10:14 ` It must surely be better Petter Fryklund
2001-08-24 13:57 ` Andrzej Lewandowski
2001-08-24 13:34 ` Petter Fryklund
2001-08-24 13:53 ` Commentary on Industry Move to C++ Gary Scott
2001-08-25 1:51 ` James Rogers
2001-08-25 6:32 ` Al Christians
2001-08-25 7:12 ` James Rogers
2001-08-29 21:26 ` Michael Bode [this message]
2001-08-24 16:59 ` Robert Dewar
2001-08-26 15:42 ` David Botton
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox