From: Kevin Chadwick <kc-usenet@chadwicks.me.uk>
Subject: Re: Ironclad, the hard-Real Time capable POSIX-like kernel written in SPARK/Ada, received an nlnet grant
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 19:52:12 -0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <vdph1c$bf5v$1@dont-email.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <vdn4rf$3ssv4$10@dont-email.me>
>> [1] https://ironclad.nongnu.org/
>
>It’s not microkernel-based, is it?
Isn't it true that monolithic kernels become more attractive when Cs
problens are removed with micro kernels swapping problems for new problems?
--
Regards, Kc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-04 19:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-03 17:38 Ironclad, the hard-Real Time capable POSIX-like kernel written in SPARK/Ada, received an nlnet grant Fernando Oleo / Irvise
2024-10-03 22:12 ` Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2024-10-04 10:28 ` Luke A. Guest
2024-10-04 16:56 ` Fernando Oleo / Irvise
2024-10-04 20:04 ` Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2024-10-04 19:52 ` Kevin Chadwick [this message]
2024-10-04 20:05 ` Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2024-10-04 22:19 ` Luke A. Guest
2024-10-04 23:55 ` Paul Rubin
2024-10-05 8:11 ` Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2024-10-05 10:47 ` Luke A. Guest
2024-10-05 23:08 ` Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2024-10-05 16:24 ` DrPi
2024-10-05 16:27 ` Luke A. Guest
2024-10-05 23:10 ` Lawrence D'Oliveiro
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox