From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen)
Subject: Re: Task execution time (writing a scheduler)
Date: 23 Jun 2003 18:24:26 -0500
Date: 2003-06-23T18:24:26-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <vchZWXnbLw0F@eisner.encompasserve.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: m3smq076jr.fsf@linux.local
In article <m3smq076jr.fsf@linux.local>, Ole Kristensen <ole@linux.local> writes:
> Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) writes:
>
> <snip>
>
>> To communicate better, you should explain what you mean by EDF.
>
> Earliest deadline first.
Well, that rule would certainly make for a rather simplistic scheduler,
allowing a task with an early deadline to fully lock out other tasks
with intermittant CPU needs to miss their deadline because the first
of their IO operations (which automatically yield the CPU) were not
allowed to start until the early deadline task finished.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-23 23:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-23 15:02 Task execution time (writing a scheduler) Lionel.DRAGHI
2003-06-23 20:46 ` Larry Kilgallen
2003-06-23 22:50 ` Ole Kristensen
2003-06-23 23:24 ` Larry Kilgallen [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-06-24 9:54 Lionel.DRAGHI
2003-06-24 13:58 `
2003-06-23 13:44 Task execution time Lionel.DRAGHI
2003-06-23 14:00 ` Task execution time (writing a scheduler) Larry Kilgallen
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox